The release comes at a time when Coinbase has made overtures to developers releasing so-called 'protocol tokens' or 'digital assets', adding new offerings to its exchange over the course of 2016. To date, this has included ether, the cryptocurrency powering the ethereum protocol, and litecoin, a bitcoin alternative.
The release follows a notable uptick in market activity, with CoinDesk's Q3 State of Blockchain report finding that nearly $200m ($198.8m) has been raised through token sales in 2016 to date, with the majority ($152m) dedicated to the failed DAO project.
Bramanathan told CoinDesk:
"There was a view that any pre-sale makes it a security, and there's a strong argument for pre-sales to be non-securities in some cases."
That the technology – and its innovators – still face a risk when seeking to launch solutions in the market is front and center in a new legal framework released today.
Coinbase declined to speak about how the release would impact its product roadmap.
Still, the paper was critical of common practices in the space, such as the tendency for developers who use such issuance models to attempt to increase the value of tokens sold as a method of generating fundraising dollars.
Though a black-and-white issues for many enthusiasts, from a legal perspective, innovation with cryptocurrencies and blockchains remains in the regulatory gray.
"Tools like this ... should help get developers on notice about these risks and maybe shed some light on why these regulations matter and should be taken seriously," director of research Peter Van Valkenburgh wrote.
"One interesting thing that we found is that if your token is properly designed, then the fact that it is a pre-sale doesn't automatically make it a security," he said.
Yet, the work stops short of offering formal legal advice. Rather, Bramanathan positioned it as a primer, focused on US law, that enables developers to be prepared when seeking guidance.
Legal book image via Shutterstock
"There are precious few lawyers who understand this space," he said.
Reuben Bramanathan, associate counsel at Coinbase, said that while the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (and its counterparts globally) have been largely silent on the issue, there are likely to be roadblocks ahead given the lack of public education on concepts such as distributed applications and autonomous organizations.
That said, he also noted that there is a limit on available expertise. For example, Bramanathan said that the work challenged his own perceptions about how the technology could be used in the context of existing regulations.
Bramanathan described the current state of the market as a "free for all", but said that the five "principles" put forward, if followed, should provide public confidence in projects.
Bramanathan acknowledged that while some lawyers have written about the subject, the industry is still largely dependent on a handful of skilled professionals whose time and energies are falling short of the needs of what they say is a growing market.
Overall, the paper is bullish on the idea that blockchains that do not restrict user participation will enable the creation of new businesses that mirror Amazon and Facebook in design, while having a similar global impact.
In a blog post accompanying the release, Coin Center echoed a similar sentiment, indicating that it believes the resources can serve the greater good as the industry continues to test uncharted waters with applications that, while based on computer science, have been regarded as financial in nature by global regulators.
"This is most useful for developers of new tokens. Certainly, most developers are aware of the risks and it's only going to get bigger as the space grows."
Led by blockchain startup Coinbase, in collaboration with Coin Center, Consensys and Union Square Ventures, the 27-page framework, goes so far as to provide users with a "decision matrix" that those involved say can help mitigate design flaws that could have real-world legal consequences.
While new, the publication marks the latest addition to a canon of research that those involved admit has perhaps not kept up with innovation.
Korean Government to Lead 6 Blockchain Pilots With $9 Million Fund
The South Korean government will invest 10 billion Korean won (or $9 million) to support blockchain development in the country, with plans to carry out six pilots using blockchain technology.
Tencent, Chinese Officials Partner on Fighting Blockchain Security Risks
Technology giant Tencent is teaming up with the Chinese government to fight blockchain-related security issues.
The firm's vice president, Bin Ma, announced the formation of the China Blockchain Se
ICON Token Swap Underway With 'No Issues,' Foundation Says
Millions of dollars worth of ICON tokens are now on the move - as the cryptocurrency project begins its token migration.
Designed to connect independent blockchain communities with a variety of gov
21e800: Bitcoin, Satoshi and the Mystery Twitter Is Obsessing Over
This is a hashtag, but not just any hashtag. In all likelihood, it's the longest and most confusing one you'll ever come across tre
Ex-FDIC Chair Bair: 'I Welcome' New Rules for Crypto
Sheila Bair, a former chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), believes the U.S. should create a wholly new regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies.
Speaking at CB Insight
$3 Billion Blockchain Tron Kicks Off Token Migration Today
The 10th most valuable cryptocurrency in the world is set to commence its token migration process on Thursday.
Created by former Ripple representative Justin Sun, Tron aims to build infrastructure
Ripple CEO Defends XRP's Utility at Fintech Conference
"Let's be clear: Ripple is different than XRP," Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of distributed ledger startup Ripple, argued during CB Insights' Future of Fintech conference on Thursday.
Bitcoin Just Got a Shoutout in a New US Supreme Court Opinion
That's not something you see every day: an opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court that makes a reference to cryptocurrencies.
On June 21, the Supreme Court issued a ruling on Wisconsin Central Ltd. v.