Soft promises feed hierarchy, hard promises feed autonomy.
Yesterday while doing my daily Bitcoin Reddit review I stumbled upon a video by Andreas Antonopoulos. Andreas is a technologist and serial entrepreneur who has become one of the most well-known and well-respected figures in bitcoin. He gave a lecture at a Bitcoin San Fransisco meetup. It’s very short (24 minutes) and is probably one of the best explanations I’ve ever heard about why governments and banks tell us that Bitcoin isn’t safe.
We are led to believe that the opposite of authority is anarchy, chaos and violence. However that is not true. The opposite of authority is autonomy, and it doesn’t give us chaos but the highest of order which we have never seen before. Predictable outcomes that can’t be changed by authority.
Another assumption of why banks and governments don’t want a system of hard promises to take control could be because it would reduce their control of what gets written, and more importantly – what gets erased. Recourse is mainly used as a mechanism of control. The system of recourse doesn’t protect consumers, it protects authority.
Now the concept of hard promises becomes less frightening and much more powerful.
If you want to see the whole video here it is (start at 1:17 after all of the fluff):
or the people in power that can get their secrets exposed on a system that cannot be silenced?
One assumption would be that if we remove systems based on soft promises a lot of those who are currently in authority will be redundant. And so in their own self interest they are using a narrative of chaos and violence if authority is removed (as been done throughout history many times before).
Bitcoin is innovative, so innovative that sometimes people have a hard time grasping the concept of what it means to have a decentralized system (and what is it good for). They think that if there is in fact such a system, that can deliver predictable and unalterable results (also known as hard promises), we need to fix it.
Hard promises can’t be broken by anything. They are immutable.
Is it the public that understands they need to be a little more careful with what they post online?
However, if you just want the main points I decided to give my personal summary of this super important talk.
It’s a program that has a hard promise as a foundation but can be softened by additional programatic features to protect consumers . For example adding multisig, escrow and refund mechanisms..
They are saying is, if a system can only deliver “hard promises” it’s dangerous to the public since nothing can be altered once it’s written (or sent in the case of Bitcoin). Consumers won’t be protected from cases of fraud or theft since everything is irreversible. They are saying “Bitcoin’s immutability is a bug not a feature“.
Why do we use soft promises as our payment system? because up until today there was no other way to conduct payments in a way that will be agreed on by the public. So one has to stop and wonder, now that we can actually move to a hard promise system, why aren’t we? Why are do banks and governments tell us that Bitcoin is dangerous?
However think of Bitcoin transaction as a program and not as payment. Since the concept of an irreversible payment is a bit scary. But a Bitcoin transaction is a program – the program is irreversible, not the payment. The program is executed exactly as written – predictable. It cannot be appealed, reversed or censored.
But today payment systems aren’t built on hard promises, they’re built on soft promises. Which means that when you go to the bank you’re hoping that the bank will fulfill their promise and allow you to withdraw money. However soft promises are easily broken – By influence, money, connection, violence and political power. And so we encounter situations in which our money is taken from us without our consent.
The people in position of authority tell us that they are there to protect us from unlawful use of our funds. However how many times has a payment done without your consent to these authority figures has been reversed or cancelled. One the other hand, how many times a payment you made by your own will to a political cause (e.g. Wikileaks) or some anti institution organization has been declined.
A good example for an autonomous system is the Internet. The Internet gives us a hard promise of “once something is publish it cannot be removed or censored”. Such a promise is not liked by people of authority. Think about it, who suffers the most from such a hard promise?
An Interview With Angelo Melis, Founder of Local World Forwarders (LWF) Project
The applications of blockchain technology across industries is increasing every day. Among these, the supply chain and logistics sector is one among them. Recognizing the need for a complete overhaul
Mario Draghi States There’s no Need for Bitcoin Regulation in Europe Right now
Europe is a rather controversial region when it comes to Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Up until this point, there is no hint of any regulatory measures whatsoever. That isnât necessarily a bad
Bitcoin Price Could Reach $10,000 if China Resumes Cryptocurrency Trading This Year
Earlier today, on October 21, the Bitcoin price achieved a new all-time high at $6,199. The market is confident that the price of Bitcoin could reach $10,000 in the mid-term if major markets such as
Coinbase Claims the Bitcoin Gold “Fork” has Already Taken Place
There are some conflicting reports regarding the Bitcoin Gold fork date. This is not entirely surprising, as the project is poorly organized at best. The website claims the âforkâ â which isnâ
Blockchain Asset Fund: Community Driven Investment Solution, Announces BAF Token Fundraiser
The cryptocurrency industry has in the recent days, broken all the past records. The rapid growth in value of the overall market has evoked mixed reactions, with some hailing the digital currency
SegWit2x Lead Mike Belshe: ‘Things Are Looking Good’ for Bitcoin Hard Fork
BitGo chief executive and SegWit2x project lead Mike Belshe says that, despite contention within the bitcoin community related to the block size debate, “things are looking good” for the SegWit2x hard
ECB Chief: Bitcoin Not ‘Mature’ Enough for Regulation
European Central Bank (ECB) chief Mario Draghi says that bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are not mature enough for regulation.
As reported by CNBC, the ECB president made these comments during a
Bitcoin Price Climbs to $6,200 as Record-Setting Advance Continues
Bitcoin’s record-setting run continued on Saturday, as the bitcoin price touched the $6,200 mark to set a new all-time high.
On Friday, bitcoin shocked analysts and investors alike when it made a s